Reconcile the numbers
Prove revenue and SDE from source documents, not a broker-entry field.
- Three years of tax returns and P&Ls
- Trailing-12-month monthly P&L
- SDE bridge with every add-back
- Bank-deposit tie-out by month
A Cook County plumbing and HVAC listing asks $1.4 million. Its advertised gross revenue and seller’s cash flow are both exactly $341,512. Before valuation, financing, or an LOI, that contradiction has to be resolved.
The surface story is attractive: a 24-year-old essential-services company, diversified across plumbing and HVAC, with a five-person team and relatively little new construction exposure. But the financial headline breaks on first contact.
Gross revenue is the sales generated before operating expenses.
SDE begins with profit and adds back eligible owner, non-cash, and one-time items.
With five employees, rent, vehicles, materials, insurance, and ordinary overhead, the two figures cannot both describe the business accurately under the usual meaning of gross revenue and SDE. The most charitable explanation is a listing-entry error. It is not proof of misconduct—but it is a hard stop on underwriting.
Using the advertised SDE at face value, the asking price is 4.10× earnings. That is not automatically wrong—but public sold-business benchmarks put the burden of proof squarely on transferability, recurring revenue, management depth, and clean financials.
$1,400,000 ÷ $341,512. This is arithmetic, not a valuation conclusion.
BizBuySell’s benchmark covers reported sales from 2021–2025. Broad averages are context, not a substitute for company-specific valuation.
The two lower SDE figures are sensitivity cases, not claims about the company. Their purpose is to show how fragile the asking multiple becomes if advertised add-backs or owner labor do not survive diligence.
The objective is not to “catch” the seller. It is to turn uncertainty into a short sequence of pass/fail gates—cheap questions first, expensive diligence only after the basics hold.
Prove revenue and SDE from source documents, not a broker-entry field.
Show that customers, systems, and licenses stay with the buyer.
SDE is not passive income. Identify the labor hidden inside it.
Ask for a corrected listing sheet plus the minimum evidence needed to decide whether the opportunity deserves a CIM review and lender conversation.
Good triage does not ask for everything. It asks for the few facts that can kill or strengthen the deal fastest.
The listing contains enough operational promise to justify one tightly scoped request—not enough evidence to justify an LOI. Resolve the duplicate financial figure, verify SDE, secure the facility path, and price the owner’s labor. Only then is a valuation conversation meaningful.
Corrected revenue supports the stated SDE; add-backs tie to source documents; customer concentration is manageable; the lease can be renewed or assigned; and the owner’s duties are replaceable within the model.
The basic figures remain unreconciled, source documents do not arrive, key relationships or licenses cannot transfer, or normalized SDE makes the asking price economically implausible.
Calculations are LOI Lens arithmetic from the cited listing: $1.4M ÷ $341,512 = 4.10×; $125K FF&E + $18K inventory = $143K; $1.4M − $143K = $1.257M. “Implied going-concern value” is a triage label, not an accounting purchase-price allocation. Listing details can change or be corrected after publication.